Simple and MAC are two distinct beauty lines catering to differing daily needs. The British brand is known for gentle moisturizers, soothing makeup removers, dependable cleansers, and refreshing toners crafted with niacinamide and glycerin, making it best suited for oily skin and mature skin. Meanwhile, the Canadian brand offers reliable moisturizers and makeup removers with balanced formulas that suit balanced skin best. While both provide thoughtful options for targeted concerns, they differ in their foundational ingredients and ideal skin types.
Simple is a British skincare brand founded in 1960 and owned by Unilever PLC since 2011.
This page compares some of the most popular Simple and MAC products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, use the Lovi app.
“Can't beat the price for the quality. — Simple Micellar Water”
+Convenience and formulation featuresOften MentionedNot noted
“Love that it has absolutely no scent. — Simple Micellar Water”
“love that it's alcohol-free — Simple Kind to Skin Soothing Facial Toner”
“No need to rinse... perfect for traveling or lazy nights. — Simple Micellar Cleansing Water”
–High price pointNot notedMostly Mentioned
“too expensive — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
–Caused breakouts and skin reactionsSometimes NotedSometimes Noted
“Gave me tiny bumps on my forehead. — Simple Micellar Water”
“caused major breakouts — Simple Hydrating Light Moisturiser”
“caused acne — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
“Breaks me out, I got pimples from this. — MAC Hyper Real Fresh Canvas Cleansing Oil”
–Struggles with waterproof makeupOften MentionedNot noted
“Did not remove my mascara very well at all. — Simple Micellar Cleansing Water”
Questions and answers
Simple or MAC: which is better?
Simple is better for value and sensitive skin since the products on this page are fragrance-free and excel at being gentle, whereas MAC is better for makeup bases and primers. Glycerin helps improve skin hydration.
Simple stands out for being more affordable and gentler on sensitive skin with fragrance-free formulas, whereas MAC is better known for makeup bases and primers but comes with a higher price point and fragrance. Glycerin helps maintain skin hydration in these products.
Simple offers more value-friendly moisturizers, while MAC provides options like Mineralize Timecheck Lotion that Lovi rates as a High fit for dry skin. Glycerin helps improve skin hydration across the products on this page.
Simple is more affordable, offering value-friendly moisturizers and a budget-friendly price point compared to MAC.
Which causes fewer breakouts, Simple or MAC?
Simple is gentler on sensitive skin compared to MAC, while both brands tie when it comes to causing breakouts and skin reactions.
Simple or MAC: which brand is better suited for sensitive skin based on fragrance and reviews?
Simple is better suited for sensitive skin because every product on this page lists no fragrance in its ingredients, whereas all MAC products on this page contain fragrance. Reviewers also mention that Simple is gentle and sensitive-skin-friendly, while noting strong fragrance and sensitivity issues with MAC.
How do the founding years and corporate ownerships of Simple and MAC compare?
Simple was founded in 1960 in the United Kingdom and has been owned by Unilever PLC since 2011, whereas MAC was founded in 1984 in Canada and has been owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.
Which brand has better performance for makeup bases and primers according to reviewers?
According to reviewers, MAC does better for makeup bases and primers.
Saccharide isomerate · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2023
Behind this comparison
Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.