m-61 skincare

Rated by Lovi · Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes · How the Fit score works

m-61 is an American skincare brand founded in 2012 and owned by Macy's, Inc. since 2015.

m-61's products on this page cover cleansers. For acne-prone skin, Lovi rates the Power Cleanse highest.

This page covers some of the most popular m-61 products; for the whole m-61 range, with a fit score for every product, use the Lovi app.

m-61 cleansers

Power Cleanse

Questions and answers

Is m-61 worth it?

Yes, m-61 is worth it because Lovi rates the m-61-focused routine Superior for dry, oily, sensitive, combination, and acne-prone skin. Furthermore, the m-61 products on this page list no fragrance in their ingredients.

What are m-61's best products?

m-61 features routines that achieve a Superior fit for dry, oily, sensitive, combination, and acne-prone skin. Lovi rates m-61-focused routines Superior for dry skin compared to CeraVe-focused routines which rate High. All the m-61 products on this page list no fragrance in their ingredients.

Which m-61 cleanser is best for oily skin?

Power Cleanse is the best choice for oily skin, as Lovi rates it High for this skin type.

Does m-61 cause breakouts?

No, m-61 products are unlikely to cause breakouts because the m-61 cleanser on this page rates High for oily and acne-prone skin. Lovi rates the m-61-focused routine Superior for acne-prone skin.

Is m-61 fragrance-free?

Yes, every m-61 product on this page lists no fragrance in its ingredients. Lovi rates the m-61 routines Superior for dry, oily, sensitive, combination, and acne-prone skin.

What are the key ingredients in m-61 products?

The key ingredients in m-61 products include panthenol, glycerin, and glycolic acid, which help nourish, soften, and smooth the skin. Additionally, the m-61 products on this page are free from added fragrance.

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2002

How do I build a m-61 skincare routine?

To build an m-61 routine, use Power Cleanse to wash oily or breakout-prone skin, where Lovi rates it High. Lovi rates the m-61 routines Superior for dry, oily, sensitive, combination, and breakout-prone skin. Every m-61 product on this page lists no fragrance in its ingredients.

What are good alternatives to m-61?

Good alternatives to m-61 include CeraVe, Cetaphil, Paula's Choice, Neutrogena, Kiehl's, and Dermalogica. These similar skincare brands also have dedicated pages on Lovi for shoppers to explore.

m-61 vs CeraVe: which is better?

m-61 is better for dry skin, oily skin, sensitive skin, combination skin, and acne-prone skin, as Lovi rates the m-61-focused routines Superior for all of these skin types while CeraVe-focused routines rate High or Superior. Additionally, the m-61 products on this page list no fragrance in their ingredients.

Who owns m-61, and where is it from?

m-61 is an American brand founded in 2012, owned by Macy's, Inc. since 2015.

glossy.co forbes.com

Is m-61 cruelty-free?

PETA, Leaping Bunny, and Cruelty Free International, the registries Lovi checks, do not list m-61 as cruelty-free.

6 more questions

Research behind m-61's key ingredients

Topical use of dexpanthenol in skin disorders
Panthenol · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2002
The efficacy of 5% topical tea tree oil gel in mild to moderate acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study
Melaleuca alternifolia tree oil leaf · Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 2007
Treatment of acne with a combination of propolis, tea tree oil, and Aloe vera compared to erythromycin cream: two double-blind investigations
Melaleuca alternifolia tree oil leaf · Clinical Pharmacology, 2018
Green tea extract reduces induction of p53 and apoptosis in UVB-irradiated human skin independent of transcriptional controls
Camellia sinensis leaf extract · Experimental Dermatology, 2009
Comparison of clinical and histological effects between lactobacillus-fermented Chamaecyparis obtusa and tea tree oil for the treatment of acne: an eight-week double-blind randomized controlled split-face study
Melaleuca alternifolia tree oil leaf · Dermatology, 2014

8 more studies

The 24-hour skin hydration and barrier function effects of a hyaluronic 1%, glycerin 5%, and Centella asiatica stem cells extract moisturizing fluid: an intra-subject, randomized, assessor-blinded study
Glycerin · Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 2017
A new topical panthenol-containing emollient: Results from two randomized controlled studies assessing its skin moisturization and barrier restoration potential, and the effect on skin microflora
Panthenol · The Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2017
Efficacy of a topical gel containing chitosan, chlorhexidine, allantoin and dexpanthenol for pain and inflammation control after third molar surgery: A randomized and placebo-controlled clinical trial
Panthenol · Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal, 2020
The efficacy of glycolic acid, salicylic acid, gluconolactone, and licochalcone A combined with 0.1% adapalene vs adapalene monotherapy in mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: a double-blinded within-person comparative study
Glycolic acid · Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 2019
Comparative Study of 35% Glycolic Acid, 20% Salicylic-10% Mandelic Acid, and Phytic Acid Combination Peels in the Treatment of Active Acne and Postacne Pigmentation
Phytic acid · Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 2019
Antiacne and antiblotch activities of a formulated combination of Aloe barbadensis leaf powder, Garcinia mangostana peel extract, and Camellia sinensis leaf extract
Camellia sinensis leaf extract · Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 2019
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the depigmenting activity of L-ascorbic acid plus phytic acid-serum vs. placebo on solar lentigines
Phytic acid · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2011
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Panthenol-Enriched Mask for Skin Barrier Recovery After Facial Laser Treatment: Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Panthenol · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025

Show fewer

Behind these ratings

Lovi rates every product from its full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.

Nadia Kapleva, MS

Co-founder, Medical Director

Cosmetic chemist, cosmetologist, aesthetic products developer
Alexey Shagraev, PhD

Co-founder, CEO and CTO

PhD in computer science, 3x US patent holder, ex-Google, ex-Yandex
Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

Medical Board

Aesthetic medicine practitioner, MSc in Longevity and Anti-Aging Medicine
Aishani Shah, MD

Medical Board

Specialist dermatologist, MBBS, MD, IFAAD
Asya Zubkova, MS

Medical Board

Cosmetic chemist, SCS, IFSCC member
Hanna Kurets, MD

Medical Board, Medical Advisor

Dermatology MD
Elina Nazarenko, MD

Medical Board

Dermatology and diagnostic consultant
Victoria Derkova, MS

Medical Board

Cosmetic chemist, cosmetic development technologist