🇫🇷France

celimax vs MAC

Rated by Lovi · Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes · How the Fit score works

celimax and MAC are two distinct brands offering thoughtfully formulated skincare, with the former being a Korean line founded in 2019 and the latter a Canadian brand established in 1984. The Korean brand is known for serums, moisturizers, toners, and makeup removers featuring ingredients like heartleaf and BHA, whereas MAC is celebrated for reliable moisturizers and makeup removers crafted from balanced formulas. Regarding skin types, the former suits sensitive and acne-prone skin best, while the latter serves balanced skin most effectively. Ultimately, they differ in their specific targeted offerings, such as the former featuring the Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad and Dual Barrier Creamy Toner, and the latter providing the Mineralize Timecheck Lotion and Hyper Real Serumizer.

celimax is a Korean skincare brand founded in 2019 and owned by ABSORBLAB Co., Ltd..

celimax.comcelimax.us

MAC is a Canadian skincare brand founded in 1984 and owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

elcompanies.comen.wikipedia.org

This page compares some of the most popular celimax and MAC products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, use the Lovi app.

Popular celimax vs MAC products

People Say

celimaxMAC
  • Lightweight Texture Often MentionedMostly Mentioned
    • “absorbs quickly — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Absorbs in a snap — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
    • “Emulsifies beautifully and rinses off without a greasy film. — MAC Hyper Real Fresh Canvas Cleansing Oil”
    • “absorbs incredibly fast — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Serum”
  • Makeup Application & Base Rarely NotedMostly Mentioned
    • “foundation glides on — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Sits beautifully under makeup — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
    • “foundation sits better — celimax RETINAL SHOT”
  • Gentle & Non-Irritating Often MentionedSometimes Noted
    • “cleans deeply without stripping — celimax Noni Acne Bubble Cleanser”
    • “Doesn't irritate — celimax Dual Barrier Creamy Toner”
    • “zero irritation or sensitivity — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Serum”
    • “Does not cause breakouts — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Hydration & Glow Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “lit-from-within look — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “gives a very beautiful glow to your skin — celimax Noni Ampoule”
  • Skin Texture & Smoothing Often MentionedSometimes Noted
    • “glass-like smoothness — celimax RETINAL SHOT”
    • “skin feels noticeably smoother — celimax Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad”
    • “smoother skin — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Pad”
    • “petal-soft skin — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Rinses Clean & Non-Stripping Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “Leaves skin feeling soft and supple, never tight. — MAC Hyper Real Fresh Canvas Cleansing Oil”
    • “cleans deeply without stripping — celimax Noni Acne Bubble Cleanser”
  • High Price Point Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “too expensive — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Herbal or Strong Scent Rarely NotedOften Mentioned
    • “smell is herbaceous... giving me a headache — celimax Noni Ampoule”
    • “Faint rubber scent — celimax Dual Barrier Creamy Toner”
    • “medicinal smell — celimax Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad”
    • “scent is overpowering — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”

Questions and answers

celimax or MAC: which is better?

For gentle hydration, celimax is often a better choice because the products on this page list no fragrance, whereas MAC items commonly feature strong scents. Lovi rates celimax as Superior for dry skin care, and reviewers frequently note that the brand helps soothe sensitive skin.

What is the difference between celimax and MAC?

celimax fits sensitive skin best and lists no fragrance in the products on this page, whereas MAC is known for makeup bases and lightweight moisturizers but includes fragrance in its formulations.

celimax or MAC: which moisturizer is better?

For a moisturizer, celimax is a better fit for dry skin, where the Dual Barrier Skin Wearable Cream earns a Superior Lovi fit level. Reviewers note that celimax offers soothing and hydrating moisturizers with no fragrance listed across its products on this page, whereas MAC moisturizers often feature strong fragrance.

Scientific Reports, 2022

Which is more affordable, celimax or MAC?

When it comes to affordability, celimax is the better option because MAC has a high price point. Lovi notes that high pricing is a negative review theme for MAC.

Which causes fewer breakouts, celimax or MAC?

celimax is gentler on acne-prone skin, with the products on this page offering High to Average Lovi fit levels for that skin type. MAC products on this page do not target acne-prone skin as specifically and carry a higher likelihood of sensitivity due to fragrance.

Which brand has more fragrance-free products, celimax or MAC?

celimax has more fragrance-free products, as every product on its page lists no fragrance in its ingredients. In contrast, none of the products on the MAC page list being fragrance-free.

When was celimax founded compared to MAC, and which companies own them?

celimax was founded in South Korea in 2019 and is owned by ABSORBLAB Co., Ltd., whereas MAC was founded in Canada in 1984 and has been owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

How does the Lovi fit level of the Dual Barrier Creamy Toner differ for dry skin between the two brands?

For dry skin, celimax features the Dual Barrier Creamy Toner with a Superior Lovi fit level, whereas MAC does not offer this product on the page. The products on this page for celimax help deliver targeted hydration.

Research behind their key ingredients

Behind this comparison

Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.

  • Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Co-founder, Medical Director

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetologist, aesthetic products developer

  • Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Co-founder, CEO and CTO

    PhD in computer science, 3x US patent holder, ex-Google, ex-Yandex

  • Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Medical Board

    Aesthetic medicine practitioner, MSc in Longevity and Anti-Aging Medicine

  • Aishani Shah, MD

    Aishani Shah, MD

    Medical Board

    Specialist dermatologist, MBBS, MD, IFAAD

  • Asya Zubkova, MS

    Asya Zubkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, SCS, IFSCC member

  • Hanna Kurets, MD

    Hanna Kurets, MD

    Medical Board, Medical Advisor

    Dermatology MD

  • Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Medical Board

    Dermatology and diagnostic consultant

  • Victoria Derkova, MS

    Victoria Derkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetic development technologist

How does it fit your skin?

Scan your face, then any product: Lovi shows how well it fits you and what fits even better.

QR code: get the Lovi app
Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play