🇸🇦Saudi Arabia

celimax vs MAC

Rated by Lovi · Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes · How the Fit score works

celimax and MAC are two distinct brands offering thoughtfully formulated skincare, with the former being a Korean line founded in 2019 and the latter a Canadian brand established in 1984. The Korean brand is known for serums, moisturizers, toners, and makeup removers featuring ingredients like heartleaf and BHA, whereas MAC is celebrated for reliable moisturizers and makeup removers crafted from balanced formulas. Regarding skin types, the former suits sensitive and acne-prone skin best, while the latter serves balanced skin most effectively. Ultimately, they differ in their specific targeted offerings, such as the former featuring the Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad and Dual Barrier Creamy Toner, and the latter providing the Mineralize Timecheck Lotion and Hyper Real Serumizer.

celimax is a Korean skincare brand founded in 2019 and owned by ABSORBLAB Co., Ltd..

celimax.comcelimax.us

MAC is a Canadian skincare brand founded in 1984 and owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

elcompanies.comen.wikipedia.org

This page compares some of the most popular celimax and MAC products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, use the Lovi app.

Popular celimax vs MAC products

People Say

celimaxMAC
  • Lightweight Texture Often MentionedMostly Mentioned
    • “absorbs quickly — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Absorbs in a snap — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
    • “Emulsifies beautifully and rinses off without a greasy film. — MAC Hyper Real Fresh Canvas Cleansing Oil”
    • “absorbs incredibly fast — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Serum”
  • Makeup Application & Base Rarely NotedMostly Mentioned
    • “foundation glides on — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Sits beautifully under makeup — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
    • “foundation sits better — celimax RETINAL SHOT”
  • Gentle & Non-Irritating Often MentionedSometimes Noted
    • “cleans deeply without stripping — celimax Noni Acne Bubble Cleanser”
    • “Doesn't irritate — celimax Dual Barrier Creamy Toner”
    • “zero irritation or sensitivity — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Serum”
    • “Does not cause breakouts — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Hydration & Glow Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “lit-from-within look — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “gives a very beautiful glow to your skin — celimax Noni Ampoule”
  • Skin Texture & Smoothing Often MentionedSometimes Noted
    • “glass-like smoothness — celimax RETINAL SHOT”
    • “skin feels noticeably smoother — celimax Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad”
    • “smoother skin — celimax Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Pad”
    • “petal-soft skin — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Rinses Clean & Non-Stripping Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “Leaves skin feeling soft and supple, never tight. — MAC Hyper Real Fresh Canvas Cleansing Oil”
    • “cleans deeply without stripping — celimax Noni Acne Bubble Cleanser”
  • High Price Point Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “too expensive — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Herbal or Strong Scent Rarely NotedOften Mentioned
    • “smell is herbaceous... giving me a headache — celimax Noni Ampoule”
    • “Faint rubber scent — celimax Dual Barrier Creamy Toner”
    • “medicinal smell — celimax Heartleaf BHA Peeling Pad”
    • “scent is overpowering — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”

Questions and answers

celimax or MAC: which is better?

celimax is better for sensitive and acne-prone skin because every product on this page lists no fragrance, whereas MAC products contain fragrance and reviewers often note sensitivity issues.

What is the difference between celimax and MAC?

celimax stands out for being gentle and fragrance-free across the products on this page, whereas MAC is known for its lightweight texture and makeup bases but frequently features strong fragrance and sensitivity. Lovi rates celimax as a High to Superior fit for dry and sensitive skin barrier care, while MAC offers lightweight moisturizers.

celimax or MAC: which moisturizer is better?

When comparing moisturizers, celimax offers a better fit for sensitive skin with products like the Dual Barrier Skin Wearable Cream achieving a Superior Lovi fit level, whereas MAC provides lightweight hydration and makeup bases that often feature strong fragrances. Reviewers note that celimax moisturizers are soothing and calming, while MAC is recognized for its lightweight textures and high price point.

Scientific Reports, 2022

Which is more affordable, celimax or MAC?

MAC is often noted for a high price point, whereas celimax is not described as expensive on this page. Review themes indicate that high price point is a negative point specifically associated with celimax.

Which causes fewer breakouts, celimax or MAC?

celimax fits acne-prone skin better than MAC, as celimax offers dedicated blemish and pore control products with a High Lovi fit level for acne-prone skin.

Which brand has more products without fragrance, celimax or MAC?

Celimax has more products without fragrance because every product on its page lists no fragrance, whereas none of the products on the MAC page do.

Which brand is better suited for sensitive and acne-prone skin, celimax or MAC?

celimax is better suited for sensitive and acne-prone skin because every product on this page lists no fragrance and reviewers note it is gentle and non-irritating, whereas MAC products often contain fragrance and sensitivity issues. Lovi rates celimax with High fits for acne-prone skin on items like the Pore+Dark Spot Brightening Serum.

Which brand was founded earlier, celimax or MAC?

MAC was founded earlier in 1984, while celimax was founded in 2019.

Research behind their key ingredients

Behind this comparison

Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.

  • Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Co-founder, Medical Director

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetologist, aesthetic products developer

  • Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Co-founder, CEO and CTO

    PhD in computer science, 3x US patent holder, ex-Google, ex-Yandex

  • Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Medical Board

    Aesthetic medicine practitioner, MSc in Longevity and Anti-Aging Medicine

  • Aishani Shah, MD

    Aishani Shah, MD

    Medical Board

    Specialist dermatologist, MBBS, MD, IFAAD

  • Asya Zubkova, MS

    Asya Zubkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, SCS, IFSCC member

  • Hanna Kurets, MD

    Hanna Kurets, MD

    Medical Board, Medical Advisor

    Dermatology MD

  • Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Medical Board

    Dermatology and diagnostic consultant

  • Victoria Derkova, MS

    Victoria Derkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetic development technologist

How does it fit your skin?

Scan your face, then any product: Lovi shows how well it fits you and what fits even better.

QR code: get the Lovi app
Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play