🇪🇸Spain

Cetaphil vs MAC

Rated by Lovi · Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes · How the Fit score works

Cetaphil and MAC are distinct beauty brands, with the former being an American line founded in 1947 and the latter a Canadian name established in 1984. Cetaphil is known for cleansers, moisturizers, serums, and sunscreens featuring glycerin, niacinamide, and panthenol, which suit combination and oily acne-prone skin best, while MAC is beloved for reliable moisturizers and makeup removers with gentle formulas that suit balanced skin best. Both brands differ in their founding heritage and targeted formulations, as the first brand provides standout solutions like antioxidant-C serums and extra gentle daily scrubs for deeper care, whereas the second brand offers measured daily maintenance through items such as timecheck lotions and cleansing oils.

Cetaphil is an American skincare brand founded in 1947 and owned by Galderma Group AG.

en.wikipedia.orgcetaphil.co.uk

MAC is a Canadian skincare brand founded in 1984 and owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

elcompanies.comen.wikipedia.org

This page compares some of the most popular Cetaphil and MAC products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, use the Lovi app.

Popular Cetaphil vs MAC products

People Say

CetaphilMAC
  • Hydration and moisture Mostly MentionedMostly Mentioned
    • “cleared up flaky skin — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
    • “healed my dry patches — Cetaphil Moisturising Cream”
    • “absorbs quickly — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Absorbs in a snap — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Gentle on sensitive skin Mostly MentionedNot noted
    • “The only thing my reactive skin tolerates. — Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser”
    • “No breakouts since switching to this. — Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser”
    • “cleans without stripping — Cetaphil Daily Facial Cleanser”
  • Excellent makeup base and primer Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “foundation glides on — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Sits beautifully under makeup — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Radiant glow and blurred pores Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “lit-from-within look — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Reduces appearance of pores — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Lightweight and non-greasy absorption Often MentionedNot noted
    • “absorbs instantly — Cetaphil Moisturizing Lotion”
    • “Absorbs quickly into skin without residue — Cetaphil Daily Hydrating Lotion”
    • “absorbs quickly — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
  • Gentle exfoliation and softening Rarely NotedSometimes Noted
    • “petal-soft skin — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Micro-fine granules don't irritate — Cetaphil Extra Gentle Daily Scrub”
  • High price point Rarely NotedMostly Mentioned
    • “expensive for drugstore — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
    • “too expensive — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Strong scent or fragrance Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “Overpowering masking fragrance — Cetaphil Gentle Cleansing Bar”
    • “Scent is overwhelmingly artificial. — Cetaphil Oily Skin Cleanser”
    • “scent is overpowering — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Breakouts and clogged pores Rarely NotedSometimes Noted
    • “caused whiteheads — Cetaphil Moisturizing Lotion”
    • “Broke me out bad — Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA Cleanser”
    • “caused small bumps — Cetaphil Moisturising Cream”
    • “caused acne — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”

Questions and answers

Cetaphil or MAC: which is better?

Cetaphil proves to be better for sensitive skin, offering gentle and non-stripping cleansers alongside hydrating formulas that fit sensitive skin with High levels. Meanwhile, MAC products on this page all contain fragrance and carry a high price point.

What is the difference between Cetaphil and MAC?

Cetaphil is generally gentler on sensitive skin, whereas MAC is noted for offering an excellent makeup base and primer along with a radiant glow and blurred pores. Reviewers highlight that Cetaphil provides lightweight and non-greasy absorption, while MAC products on this page often come with a higher price point and strong fragrance.

Cetaphil or MAC: which moisturizer is better?

Cetaphil is better for hydration and moisture, offering multiple options with a High Lovi fit level for dry skin, such as the Daily Hydrating Lotion. MAC products on this page often feature strong fragrances, whereas Cetaphil features mostly fragrance-free formulations.

Which is more affordable, Cetaphil or MAC?

Cetaphil is more affordable, whereas MAC has a high price point.

Which causes fewer breakouts, Cetaphil or MAC?

MAC does better than Cetaphil on breakouts and clogged pores. Reviewers note that Cetaphil has drawbacks including breakouts and clogged pores, while MAC avoids this issue.

When was each brand founded and which companies own them?

Cetaphil was founded in 1947 in the United States and is owned by Galderma Group AG, while MAC was founded in 1984 in Canada and is owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

How does the fragrance content differ between Cetaphil and MAC products?

Cetaphil products on this page are mostly fragrance-free with only one listing fragrance, whereas all MAC products on this page list fragrance. Niacinamide in these formulas helps manage skin tone and pigmentation.

The British Journal of Dermatology, 2002Antioxidants, 2021

Which brand performs better for being gentle on sensitive skin according to the review themes?

Cetaphil performs better than MAC for being gentle on sensitive skin. Lovi rates multiple Cetaphil cleansers and sunscreens as having a Superior fit for sensitive skin, whereas MAC products on this page frequently involve strong fragrance and sensitivity.

Research behind their key ingredients

Behind this comparison

Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.

  • Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Co-founder, Medical Director

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetologist, aesthetic products developer

  • Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Co-founder, CEO and CTO

    PhD in computer science, 3x US patent holder, ex-Google, ex-Yandex

  • Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Medical Board

    Aesthetic medicine practitioner, MSc in Longevity and Anti-Aging Medicine

  • Aishani Shah, MD

    Aishani Shah, MD

    Medical Board

    Specialist dermatologist, MBBS, MD, IFAAD

  • Asya Zubkova, MS

    Asya Zubkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, SCS, IFSCC member

  • Hanna Kurets, MD

    Hanna Kurets, MD

    Medical Board, Medical Advisor

    Dermatology MD

  • Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Medical Board

    Dermatology and diagnostic consultant

  • Victoria Derkova, MS

    Victoria Derkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetic development technologist

How does it fit your skin?

Scan your face, then any product: Lovi shows how well it fits you and what fits even better.

QR code: get the Lovi app
Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play