🇩🇪Germany

Cetaphil vs MAC

Rated by Lovi · Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes · How the Fit score works

Cetaphil and MAC are distinct beauty brands originating from America and Canada, respectively. Cetaphil is widely loved for its thoughtful range of cleansers, moisturizers, serums, and sunscreens formulated with glycerin, niacinamide, and panthenol, while MAC is beloved for its reliable moisturizers and makeup removers crafted from carefully balanced formulas. These offerings suit different needs, as the American line suits combination skin and acne-prone skin best, and the Canadian line suits balanced skin best. While both provide a calm and measured foundation for daily maintenance, they differ in their specific ingredient profiles and targeted solutions for mature skin and dark spots.

Cetaphil is an American skincare brand founded in 1947 and owned by Galderma Group AG.

en.wikipedia.orgcetaphil.co.uk

MAC is a Canadian skincare brand founded in 1984 and owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

elcompanies.comen.wikipedia.org

This page compares some of the most popular Cetaphil and MAC products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, use the Lovi app.

Popular Cetaphil vs MAC products

People Say

CetaphilMAC
  • Hydration and moisture Mostly MentionedMostly Mentioned
    • “cleared up flaky skin — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
    • “healed my dry patches — Cetaphil Moisturising Cream”
    • “absorbs quickly — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Absorbs in a snap — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Gentle on sensitive skin Mostly MentionedNot noted
    • “The only thing my reactive skin tolerates. — Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser”
    • “No breakouts since switching to this. — Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser”
    • “cleans without stripping — Cetaphil Daily Facial Cleanser”
  • Excellent makeup base and primer Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “foundation glides on — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Sits beautifully under makeup — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Radiant glow and blurred pores Not notedMostly Mentioned
    • “lit-from-within look — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Reduces appearance of pores — MAC Mineralize Timecheck Lotion”
  • Lightweight and non-greasy absorption Often MentionedNot noted
    • “absorbs instantly — Cetaphil Moisturizing Lotion”
    • “Absorbs quickly into skin without residue — Cetaphil Daily Hydrating Lotion”
    • “absorbs quickly — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
  • Gentle exfoliation and softening Rarely NotedSometimes Noted
    • “petal-soft skin — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
    • “Micro-fine granules don't irritate — Cetaphil Extra Gentle Daily Scrub”
  • High price point Rarely NotedMostly Mentioned
    • “expensive for drugstore — Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream”
    • “too expensive — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Strong scent or fragrance Sometimes NotedOften Mentioned
    • “Overpowering masking fragrance — Cetaphil Gentle Cleansing Bar”
    • “Scent is overwhelmingly artificial. — Cetaphil Oily Skin Cleanser”
    • “scent is overpowering — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”
  • Breakouts and clogged pores Rarely NotedSometimes Noted
    • “caused whiteheads — Cetaphil Moisturizing Lotion”
    • “Broke me out bad — Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA Cleanser”
    • “caused small bumps — Cetaphil Moisturising Cream”
    • “caused acne — MAC Hyper Real Serumizer”

Questions and answers

Cetaphil or MAC: which is better?

Cetaphil is better for sensitive skin, offering gentle, non-stripping cleansers and lightweight moisturizers. MAC tends to perform better for makeup bases and primers, though its products often contain fragrance.

What is the difference between Cetaphil and MAC?

Cetaphil focuses on gentle, fragrance-free cleansers and moisturizers that feature key ingredients like niacinamide and hyaluronic acid, making it a strong match for sensitive and acne-prone skin types. MAC offers lightweight moisturizers, cleansers, and makeup bases, though its products on this page frequently contain fragrance and come at a higher price point. Reviewers note that Cetaphil delivers better results for lightweight absorption and sensitive skin, while MAC excels as a makeup base.

The British Journal of Dermatology, 2002Dermatologic Therapy, 2022

Cetaphil or MAC: which moisturizer is better?

Cetaphil is better for moisturization, as the products on this page achieve high ratings for dry and mature skin while maintaining a fragrance-free formula that is unlikely to irritate. MAC offers lightweight moisturizers, but they frequently include fragrance and come with a higher price point.

Which is more affordable, Cetaphil or MAC?

MAC has a high price point while Cetaphil does better for affordability.

Which causes fewer breakouts, Cetaphil or MAC?

MAC has no breakout issues reported on this page, whereas breakout and clogged pore issues are sometimes noted for Cetaphil. Lovi fit ratings for breakout-prone skin across the products on this page vary, with Cetaphil including options ranging from Superior to Warning.

When was Cetaphil founded compared to MAC, and who owns each brand?

Cetaphil was founded in 1947 in the United States and is owned by Galderma Group AG, whereas MAC was founded in 1984 in Canada and is owned by The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. since 1994.

How does the fragrance content compare between Cetaphil and MAC products on this page?

Cetaphil products on this page are mostly fragrance-free with only one listing fragrance, whereas all MAC products on this page list fragrance.

Which brand performs better for hydration and moisture according to review themes?

According to the review themes, both Cetaphil and MAC perform equally well for hydration and moisture.

Research behind their key ingredients

Behind this comparison

Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules our dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update.

  • Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Nadia Kapleva, MS

    Co-founder, Medical Director

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetologist, aesthetic products developer

  • Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Alexey Shagraev, PhD

    Co-founder, CEO and CTO

    PhD in computer science, 3x US patent holder, ex-Google, ex-Yandex

  • Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc

    Medical Board

    Aesthetic medicine practitioner, MSc in Longevity and Anti-Aging Medicine

  • Aishani Shah, MD

    Aishani Shah, MD

    Medical Board

    Specialist dermatologist, MBBS, MD, IFAAD

  • Asya Zubkova, MS

    Asya Zubkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, SCS, IFSCC member

  • Hanna Kurets, MD

    Hanna Kurets, MD

    Medical Board, Medical Advisor

    Dermatology MD

  • Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Elina Nazarenko, MD

    Medical Board

    Dermatology and diagnostic consultant

  • Victoria Derkova, MS

    Victoria Derkova, MS

    Medical Board

    Cosmetic chemist, cosmetic development technologist

How does it fit your skin?

Scan your face, then any product: Lovi shows how well it fits you and what fits even better.

QR code: get the Lovi app
Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play