# A+ vs Sand & Sky Page: https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky The Lovi Fit is the same in every country; only the stores and prices differ, and the ones here are for Spain. A+ and Sand & Sky are skincare brands known for their thoughtful formulations, with the Indian brand founded in 1990 focusing on gentle moisturizers and the Australian line celebrated for its purifying masks. The former suits sensitive skin best through a mild composition that supports daily moisture balance, while the latter suits combination, oily, and acne-prone skin best with botanical ingredients that gently clarify and balance the complexion. Users often choose between the two based on whether they need the 345 Relief Cream for sensitive skin or the [Australian Pink Clay](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/ingredients/pink-clay) Porefining Face Mask for targeted acne care. A+ is an Indian skincare brand founded in 1990. [pitchbook.com](https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/554388-85) This page compares some of the most popular A+ and Sand & Sky products; for every product of both brands, with a fit score for your own skin, [use the Lovi app](https://app.pora.ai/vqqJ/j1xj2b6o?af_sub2=compare&af_sub3=selection_note&af_sub4=pg1d75f9401c). ### Popular A+ vs Sand & Sky products #### Sand & Sky - [Australian Pink Clay Porefining Face Mask](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/p/sand-and-sky/australian-pink-clay-porefining-face-mask/for/acne-prone-skin) — High fit #### A+ - [345 Relief Cream](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/p/a/345-relief-cream/for/sensitive-skin) — Average fit ## Questions and answers ### A+ or Sand & Sky: which is better? Neither brand is universally better, as A+ offers fragrance-free choices for sensitive skin while Sand & Sky achieves High Lovi fit levels for oily and acne-prone skin. ### What is the difference between A+ and Sand & Sky? Sand & Sky fits oily and acne-prone skin with a High rating, whereas A+ products on this page receive an Average fit for those skin types. Additionally, every product from A+ on this page is fragrance-free, while the Sand & Sky mask contains fragrance. ### Which is more affordable, A+ or Sand & Sky? The provided page facts do not contain pricing information, so it is not possible to determine whether A+ or Sand & Sky is more affordable. ### Which causes fewer breakouts, A+ or Sand & Sky? Sand & Sky has a High Lovi fit for acne-prone skin with its [Australian Pink Clay](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/ingredients/pink-clay) Porefining Face Mask, whereas the products on this page from A+ have an Average fit for acne-prone skin. ### Which of the two brands includes fragrance in its skincare products? Sand & Sky includes fragrance in the products on this page, while A+ lists no fragrance across its range. ### How does the Lovi fit level for dry skin compare between A+ and Sand & Sky's Australian Pink Clay Porefining Face Mask? For dry skin, A+ gets an Average Lovi fit, while Sand & Sky's Australian Pink Clay Porefining Face Mask also achieves an Average Lovi fit. ### When were the companies behind A+ and Sand & Sky founded? A+ was founded in 1990, while the company behind Sand & Sky was founded in 2017. ## Research behind their key ingredients - [The effect of niacinamide on reducing cutaneous pigmentation and suppression of melanosome transfer](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12100180/) Niacinamide · The British Journal of Dermatology, 2002 - [Topical use of dexpanthenol in skin disorders](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12113650/) Panthenol · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2002 - [Treatment of acne with a combination of propolis, tea tree oil, and Aloe vera compared to erythromycin cream: two double-blind investigations](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30588129/) Aloe barbadensis leaf juice · Clinical Pharmacology, 2018 - [Ceramide 1 and ceramide 3 act synergistically on skin hydration and the transepidermal water loss of sodium lauryl sulfate-irritated skin](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18717861/) Ceramide np · International Journal of Dermatology, 2008 - [Clinical, biometric and structural evaluation of the long-term effects of a topical treatment with ascorbic acid and madecassoside in photoaged human skin](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18503551/) Centella asiatica leaf extract · Experimental Dermatology, 2008 - [The 24-hour skin hydration and barrier function effects of a hyaluronic 1%, glycerin 5%, and Centella asiatica stem cells extract moisturizing fluid: an intra-subject, randomized, assessor-blinded study](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28860834/) Glycerin · Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 2017 - [Randomized controlled study for the anti-aging effect of human adipocyte-derived mesenchymal stem cell media combined with niacinamide after laser therapy](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33103316/) Niacinamide · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2021 - [Quaternized carboxymethyl chitosan/organic montmorillonite nanocomposite as a novel cosmetic ingredient against skin aging](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28732847/) Bentonite · Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017 - [A new topical panthenol-containing emollient: Results from two randomized controlled studies assessing its skin moisturization and barrier restoration potential, and the effect on skin microflora](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27425824/) Panthenol · The Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2017 - [Senomorphic activity of a combination of niacinamide and hyaluronic acid: correlation with clinical improvement of skin aging](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39009698/) Niacinamide · Scientific Reports, 2024 - [High molecular compounds (polysaccharides and proanthocyanidins) from Hamamelis virginiana bark: influence on human skin keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation and influence on irritated skin](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11684194/) Witch hazel bark extract · Phytochemistry, 2001 - [Systematic Study of Paeonol/Madecassoside Co-Delivery Nanoemulsion Transdermal Delivery System for Enhancing Barrier Repair and Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37446936/) Centella asiatica leaf extract · Molecules, 2023 - [A Lipid Mixture Enriched by Ceramide NP with Fatty Acids of Diverse Chain Lengths Contributes to Restore the Skin Barrier Function Impaired by Topical Corticosteroid](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34348350/) Ceramide np · Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 2022 - [Efficacy and safety of moisturizer containing 5% panthenol, madecassoside, and copper-zinc-manganese versus 0.02% triamcinolone acetonide cream in decreasing adverse reaction and downtime after ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: A split-face, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30945430/) Centella asiatica leaf extract · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2019 - [Development of solid lipid microparticles (SLMs) containing asiatic acid for topical treatment of acne: Characterization, stability, in vitro and in vivo anti-acne assessment](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38460769/) Centella asiatica leaf extract · International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2024 - [Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Panthenol-Enriched Mask for Skin Barrier Recovery After Facial Laser Treatment: Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40613435/) Panthenol · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025 - [Safety assessment on comedogenicity of dermatological products containing d-alpha tocopheryl acetate in Asian subjects: A double-blind randomized controlled trial](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34471722/) Vitamin e tocopheryl acetate · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 2021 - [The Therapeutic Effects of a Bentonite-Based Facial Mask With Alcea sulphurea Extract on Acne Severity and Patient Experience: Add-On Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41347526/) Bentonite · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025 ## The brands - Indian skincare: [A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/brands/a) - Skincare: [Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/brands/sand-and-sky) ## More comparisons - [SKIN1004 vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/skin1004-vs-a) - [SKIN1004 vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/skin1004-vs-sand-and-sky) - [Anua vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/anua-vs-a) - [Anua vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/anua-vs-sand-and-sky) - [Medicube vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/medicube-vs-a) - [Medicube vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/medicube-vs-sand-and-sky) - [The Ordinary vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/the-ordinary-vs-a) - [The Ordinary vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/the-ordinary-vs-sand-and-sky) - [Beauty of Joseon vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/beauty-of-joseon-vs-a) - [Beauty of Joseon vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/beauty-of-joseon-vs-sand-and-sky) - [COSRX vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/cosrx-vs-a) - [COSRX vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/cosrx-vs-sand-and-sky) - [CeraVe vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/cerave-vs-a) - [CeraVe vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/cerave-vs-sand-and-sky) - [La Roche-Posay vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/la-roche-posay-vs-a) - [La Roche-Posay vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/la-roche-posay-vs-sand-and-sky) - [Dr. Althea vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/dr-althea-vs-a) - [Dr. Althea vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/dr-althea-vs-sand-and-sky) - [Some By Mi vs A+](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/some-by-mi-vs-a) - [Some By Mi vs Sand & Sky](https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/some-by-mi-vs-sand-and-sky) ## About the Lovi Fit Lovi: Unbiased, science-based skincare AI trained on real user outcomes. Lovi compares products by their fit scores, calculated from the full ingredient list with brand-independent rules its dermatologists and cosmetic chemists build and review, and personalizes every pick with AI trained on the real results of millions of users. Lovi trains its fit score models on a proprietary dataset built from more than 10,000 expert-labeled products and more than 100,000 simulated examples, following an internally consistent methodology presented at Cosmoprof, AMWC, and Skin of Color Update. Levels from best to worst: Superior, High, Average, Low, Caution, Warning. Behind this comparison: Nadia Kapleva, MS (Co-founder, Medical Director); Alexey Shagraev, PhD (Co-founder, CEO and CTO); Dr. Sofía Perea Pérez, MD, MSc (Medical Board); Aishani Shah, MD (Medical Board); Asya Zubkova, MS (Medical Board); Hanna Kurets, MD (Medical Board, Medical Advisor); Elina Nazarenko, MD (Medical Board); Victoria Derkova, MS (Medical Board). Page built Nov 8, 2026. More from Lovi: https://lovi.care/skincare/llms.txt ## This page in other countries - United States: https://lovi.care/skincare/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - United Kingdom: https://lovi.care/skincare/uk/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Ireland: https://lovi.care/skincare/ie/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Germany: https://lovi.care/skincare/de/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - France: https://lovi.care/skincare/fr/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Italy: https://lovi.care/skincare/it/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Netherlands: https://lovi.care/skincare/nl/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Spain: https://lovi.care/skincare/es/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky (this page) - Canada: https://lovi.care/skincare/ca/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Australia: https://lovi.care/skincare/au/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Singapore: https://lovi.care/skincare/sg/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - Saudi Arabia: https://lovi.care/skincare/sa/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky - United Arab Emirates: https://lovi.care/skincare/ae/compare/a-vs-sand-and-sky